The Lt. who initially pulled her over is seen stomping over to her vehicle and just as he arrives the first two goons pull her from her car and slam her down on the pavement face first (she was not resisting) while the video clearly shows the Lt. with his expandable baton doing an up-an-down striking motion several times as she is being extracted from the car. She testified that he hit her on the back of her legs several times and his explanation was that the motion seen on the video tape was him closing his baton with the help of the pavement.   

Client was taken to sub-station and given fields and did a blow. Failed fields and blew 0.0 twice. Lt. then called in DRE officer and he did the standard 12-step test and concluded "driving while impaired". She admitted to both officers she was bi-polar and under a doctor's care and was taking prescribed meds. She even offered to call Walgreen's and did so to get the names of her meds for the officers. Client taken to a hospital for a blood draw. Sample sent to Albuq. and toxicology report came back with 3 of the meds "present" and the other two stating <0.10mg/l. Client could not afford an expert witness to explain the report so Peter cross examined the state's chemist and backed her into corners time and time again regarding the findings.M.J. Keefe helped him prepare this case by doing re-enactments and role reversal with deputies, (actually had client present for one session), voir dire and some other lawyers who had been to Regionals. Also, he want to acknowledge that he owes a debt of gratitude to Kelli from Atlanta, Georgia for passing along some great DRE cross questions.End result: Jurors out for less than 30-minutes with verdict of NOT GUILTY. Client was very worried that she would lose her kindergarten teaching job with conviction--she would also have her driver's license revoked for up to 1-yr and she would be required to install an inter-lock device on any vehicle she operated for 1-year.NOTE: After verdict, asst. d.a. who tried the case came over and opened his file and laid it in front of him to show him he granted my request to Nolle the case about a year ago by showing him his memo to his supervisor. Supervisor interlineated all over his memo how he could kick his ass and that it didn't matter how cops treated his client and that she was driving while impaired to the slightest degree, and that jury would convict her!A personal note from Peter-
THANK GOD I AM A WARRIOR AND THANKS TO ALL THE SELFLESS FELLOW WARRIORS WHO DROP STUFF TO JUMP IN THE FOXHOLE OF TRIAL WORK TO COVER EACH OTHERS BACK.