Check Out Our  Upcoming Course Schedule


TLC's Grads, Brooks Cutter and Eric Ratinoff  won a verdict on behalf of a 22 year old woman who was paralyzed from her chest down after the U.C. Davis Medical Center failed to identify a mass on her spine that appeared in her MRI films. $7.6 million is believed to be one of the largest medical malpractice verdicts in Sacramento County history. 

Here is a article summarizing the case in the Sacramento Business Journal: 

Elk Grove woman wins $7.6M in UC Davis malpractice suit 

Sacramento Business Journal by Kathy Robertson, Senior Staff Writer 

Date: Monday, October 31, 2011, 2:53pm PDT - Last Modified: Tuesday, November 1, 2011, 8:23am PDT 

A young Elk Grove woman won a $7.6 million from the UC Regents in a jury verdict Friday after a UC Davis radiologist missed an abnormality on her spine that later grew and caused her to become paralyzed from the waist down.  

The verdict, won by Sacramento attorneys Brooks Cutter and Eric Ratinoff, is believed to be one of the largest medical malpractice judgments in Sacramento County history.  

The plaintiff was awarded $6.4 million to compensate for lost wages and costs associated with the medical and attendant care she will need the rest of her life. The jury awarded $1.2 million in pain and suffering, but California’s medical malpractice law caps these damages at $250,000, so she’ll collect $6.67 million if the verdict stands.  

It was unclear Monday afternoon whether the university would appeal.  “

The jury did a thorough, careful review of the evidence and came up with an award that will enable this young woman to move forward with her life independently with the resources she needs,” Cutter said. “She’ll be in a wheelchair the rest of her life.”  

D’Knawn Hairston was 13 and experiencing back pain and loss of sensation in her lower extremities when she was hospitalized at the UC Davis Medical Center in December 2003, court documents show. She had an MRI of her spine, but the pediatric radiologist and radiology resident who viewed the images stated the spine was normal and unremarkable. In fact, the images show an abnormal mass on the spine, according to court documents. 

UC Davis doctors concluded Hairston was suffering from Guillain-Barre Syndrome and treated her for that condition. She continued to have lingering weakness in her lower extremities.  

On February 1, 2008, Hairston awoke unable to move her legs, with pain in her lower back. She was hospitalized and an MRI showed a large, bleeding growth on her spine at the same place where the abnormality was detected on the images taken in 2003. It was removed, but Hairston had permanent injury to her spinal cord, rendering her paraplegic, with no sensation or muscle control from her mid-torso downward.  

An expert testified on behalf of Hairston that the abnormality along her spine should have been detected and removed in 2003. An expert called by the medical center countered that the mass was ”subtle” and it was within standards of care to miss it.  

The jury found Hairston’s injuries were caused by medical negligence. 

A spokeswoman said the university and the UC Davis Health System empathize with Hairston and her family, but they could not discuss the details of the case. However, Leslie Sepuka of the president’s office said that an investigation was done into the patient’s care, and that it was “appropriate.”

  “This is a regrettable and unfortunate case for everyone involved,” Sepuka said. “As always, the UC Davis Health System is committed to providing high quality patient care and safety.”

- See more at: http://triallawyerscollege.dca360.com.aspx?y=2011#sthash.rcAPk2Dh.dpuf

 
Trial Lawyers College
April 1, 2024

Voir dire, interrogating jurors by legal counsel is foundational to a fair trial. This article unpacks the voir dire process—how it screens for bias and why it is pivotal for justice. Read on to gain insights into this essential legal procedure. We also want to encourage you to learn more about how the TLC Method can help you master voir dire!

 
Trial Lawyers College
March 25, 2024

In an ever-evolving legal landscape, staying at the forefront of legal knowledge and practice is not just an option but a necessity. This is where legal continuing education online comes into play. But what exactly does continuing legal education mean? How does it impact the professional growth of attorneys? And how can one navigate the diverse range of online CLE courses and CLE programs available today?

This comprehensive guide delves into these questions, offering a deep dive into the world of continuing legal education. It explores the significance of CLE credit, the rules governing CLE, and the benefits of unlimited access to online CLE courses. From the requirements set by the Florida Bar and the American Bar Association to the specific CLE rules in jurisdictions like West Virginia, New York, California, New Jersey, and all others, this article provides a panoramic view of the CLE landscape.

Whether you're a seasoned attorney seeking to enhance your practice or a law student curious about the path ahead, this article promises to be an engaging and informative read. So, are you ready to unlock your professional growth with legal continuing education online? Let's dive in.

 
Trial Lawyers College
March 4, 2024

Imagine stepping into the courtroom, your heart beating with anticipation yet steadied by confidence. This isn't just a fleeting daydream but a reality for attorney Mike Smith, a dedicated personal injury and workers' compensation attorney from Atlanta, Georgia. His transformative journey with the Trial Lawyers College (TLC) has reshaped his approach to law and professional identity.

×

Please enter your email to reset your password. If your email matches an existing profile you will receive an email with a one-time password reset.

×

Check your email to retrieve the password we have just sent. If you do not receive an email, please check your spam or your firewall settings. If the problem persists, contact admin@triallawyerscollege.org

×