Check Out Our  Upcoming Course Schedule


Case tried by John Naizby, TLC 2000 

My client, Rene, was 33 at the time he suffered this injury. He was shooting baskets with a co-worker, Rob, before work. They were on the court for 15 minutes. Rene was jogging after a rebound and slipped on a puddle of water, which Rob described as 6- 8 inches in diameter - the size of a personal pizza. Rene suffered ankle fractures on both sides of his ankle requiring or if surgery with two plates and 21 screws. Nine months later a second surgery removed all hardware but one screw and a third surgery were done to address a painful neuroma that developed at the site of the incision on his ankle. He developed post-traumatic arthritis and is projected to undergo at least one ankle fusion in the future, possibly a second based on his relatively young age, currently 36. He has difficulty ascending stairs and running is in large part prohibited. He has two daughters Brianna, 5 and Bianca, 16 and his partner Michelle, and two dogs. He has difficulty playing with his children and is sensitive to touch on the site of his incision secondary to the neuroma. He also had to give up salsa dancing, which was a passion of his - his brother described at trial that people would get out of his way on the dance floor. 

He had $125,000 in past medical bills and testimony of the cost of future surgery to be between 20 to 40 thousand. We brought suit against the gym, they brought suit against the building owner and we plead over. We were very lucky to track down many former employees who were familiar with the leak. This case was referred to me just prior to the suit running. At that time the offer was zero but after several depositions, the offer was $250,000. On the day of jury selection, they offered to pay $450,000.00. My client declined their offer. After trial, the Jury returned a verdict of $125,000.00 for past medical expenses and $275,000.00 for future medical expenses. The jury returned non-economic damages in the amount of $4,000,000.00. The building owner was found 35% at fault and LA. Fitness was found to be 65% at fault. Unfortunately for my client, the 65% portion of the verdict is being contested post-trial. 

The Jury understood who Rene was - a hard worker who took a G.E.D. and rose to the level of sales manager at Greenwich Honda. He started off with a difficult road; he was the oldest of three. He and two half-brothers, Roberto and Kevin, all grew up in the projects of the Bronx. We had half the challenges during jury selection because they had two defendants, so we were unable to get the jurors we wanted the most, but were fortunate enough to have six people see Rene for who he was and to see how this injury changed his life. 

Rene and I became close friends during the two years we spent getting ready for trial. We shared meals both just the two of us and with his family. I spent several days at the dealership just observing and interacting with his co-workers. I spent time in the Bronx in his old neighborhood. The Rodriguez's are a great family and I was lucky to have had the privilege to represent them. I will never forget the day before closing, he texted me, 'win or lose, we are going out after the trial. You did a great job.' This meant a lot to me as you know, you leave a small piece of yourself in every client's life, and then after the closing argument, he sent me a text. I had a good chuckle on my way driving home, he said, 'your first part was good but the second time you spoke was even better than anything I have seen in the movies'.

 
Trial Lawyers College
April 1, 2024

Voir dire, interrogating jurors by legal counsel is foundational to a fair trial. This article unpacks the voir dire process—how it screens for bias and why it is pivotal for justice. Read on to gain insights into this essential legal procedure. We also want to encourage you to learn more about how the TLC Method can help you master voir dire!

 
Trial Lawyers College
March 25, 2024

In an ever-evolving legal landscape, staying at the forefront of legal knowledge and practice is not just an option but a necessity. This is where legal continuing education online comes into play. But what exactly does continuing legal education mean? How does it impact the professional growth of attorneys? And how can one navigate the diverse range of online CLE courses and CLE programs available today?

This comprehensive guide delves into these questions, offering a deep dive into the world of continuing legal education. It explores the significance of CLE credit, the rules governing CLE, and the benefits of unlimited access to online CLE courses. From the requirements set by the Florida Bar and the American Bar Association to the specific CLE rules in jurisdictions like West Virginia, New York, California, New Jersey, and all others, this article provides a panoramic view of the CLE landscape.

Whether you're a seasoned attorney seeking to enhance your practice or a law student curious about the path ahead, this article promises to be an engaging and informative read. So, are you ready to unlock your professional growth with legal continuing education online? Let's dive in.

 
Trial Lawyers College
March 4, 2024

Imagine stepping into the courtroom, your heart beating with anticipation yet steadied by confidence. This isn't just a fleeting daydream but a reality for attorney Mike Smith, a dedicated personal injury and workers' compensation attorney from Atlanta, Georgia. His transformative journey with the Trial Lawyers College (TLC) has reshaped his approach to law and professional identity.

×

Please enter your email to reset your password. If your email matches an existing profile you will receive an email with a one-time password reset.

×

Check your email to retrieve the password we have just sent. If you do not receive an email, please check your spam or your firewall settings. If the problem persists, contact admin@triallawyerscollege.org

×